[dead]
Re:Ajit Pai calls California’s net neutrality rules “illegal”
by samuelg123 on Monday September 17, 2018 @01:18PM
(#18007863)
I don’t think his actions are representative of what Indian people think; they’re just proof of his own greed.
Re:Ajit Pai calls California’s net neutrality rules “illegal”
by khazhou on Monday September 17, 2018 @01:23PM
(#18007906)
I will clarify my question, since that is not what I was wondering.
Re:Ajit Pai calls California’s net neutrality rules “illegal”
by dopamean on Monday September 17, 2018 @01:17PM
(#18007846)
What does that have to do with anything?
Re:Ajit Pai calls California’s net neutrality rules “illegal”
by yarrel on Monday September 17, 2018 @01:38PM
(#18008047)
You're postulating an imaginary hive mind on the part of "Indian-Americans" then asking how ethnically tribal it is.
It's like asking if whitey is proud of Donald Trump. The problems start before the question is halfway asked.
Re:Ajit Pai calls California’s net neutrality rules “illegal”
by khazhou on Monday September 17, 2018 @02:23PM
(#18008518)
I am not postulating a hive mind, and my question is not based on any racism (as you are implying).
Your DJT analogy is wrong because every single president has been white, so DJT's rise to prominence is not exceptional in that regard.
A better analogy, and hopefully it demonstrates the nature of my question: One can ask whether Barack Obama is generally well-regarded as a source of pride in the African-American community, or seen negatively, or as a no-op. That question has a very clear answer.
Similarly, few Indian-Americans have risen to prominence in the US government, and I wondered if that serves as a source of pride, or the opposite due to his policies, or neither.