[dead]
Re:Group Opposing Sex Work Gave Money to Prosecutors: Got St...
by coldtea on Saturday March 24, 2018 @03:27PM
(#16668382)
Well, "marrying a dog" or "fucking a dog" for that matter, hasn't been part of human society of all kinds for millennia. Prostitution has.
Nor is marrying a dog the exact same act as an otherwise totally acceptable act, but done for money (as is prostitution vs regular sex).
I think we should absolutely penalize bogus argumentation, where those making haven't spent more than a second thinking it out...
Re:Group Opposing Sex Work Gave Money to Prosecutors: Got St...
by askafriend on Saturday March 24, 2018 @12:42PM
(#16667468)
The only reason not to would be because of additional beauracratic overhead of supporting such an edgecase.
Otherwise who cares if some people want to marry a dog. Just because you make it legal doesn’t mean everyone is all of a sudden going to start marrying dogs...
Re:Group Opposing Sex Work Gave Money to Prosecutors: Got St...
by roywiggins on Saturday March 24, 2018 @12:57PM
(#16667531)
Usually both parties to a marriage are meant to be able to consent to it, so, no.
The other problem is that animals aren't legal persons and can't take part in contracts, let alone marriage.
Re:Group Opposing Sex Work Gave Money to Prosecutors: Got St...
by domevent on Saturday March 24, 2018 @01:28PM
(#16667700)
Why do people always go right to bestiality whenever someone wants their rights to be respected? Gay people marrying, omg they’re going to marry dogs next!
No... they won’t. And they haven’t. I think it’s judt a way to try and instill disgust without having to own it, in other words, a dog whistle.