[dead]
Re:Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money...
by dahdum on Monday March 05, 2018 @10:20PM
(#16526619)
For 22 million they did what exactly? Hired someone who didn’t want the job at the last minute to avoid legal issues, who hired junior professors for roles that were meant to be prestigious.
Instead of hosting a conference, they attended a Catholic conference promoting traditional marriage.
Re:Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money...
by prepend on Monday March 05, 2018 @11:09PM
(#16526794)
It’s a public policy institute, not cancer research. That should have been a substantial endowment with perpetual time scale of $5-10M/year. Considering a tenure professor is $1-200k (with overhead to take care of building) and a world class conference is $500k-1M, this should be substantial.
For comparison, the Harvard Kennedy school has a $1.2B endowment and has 500 faculty (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_School_of_Gove...) so with $200M that could be 50-75 top notch professors.
Re:Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money...
by kei29ssj on Monday March 05, 2018 @11:13PM
(#16526807)
Haha look at you, defending rich people for free!
Ok, yep those numbers add up to other numbers
But let’s not pretend that tells the whole story. No one here was in those meetings.
Re:Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money...
by cassieramen on Monday March 05, 2018 @10:13PM
(#16526597)
If that is true, don't you think the university had a duty to communicate that? It seems like the u of Chicago promised them a first class institute and is not delivering. If that was never possible then it seems like a clear bad faith agreement.
Re:Pearsons, Who Pledged $100M to UChicago, Want Their Money...
by oh_sigh on Monday March 05, 2018 @10:38PM
(#16526692)
It was the second largest donation in the school's history, and if it really was a paltry sum, UChi could have just rejected the donation, or at least rejected the donation if it came with any strings attached.