News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Distributed Ledger without the Blockchain by cocktailpeanuts on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @07:18PM (#15405610)
> Bullshit.

Hey, be nice.

> Blockchain does not build distributed consensus, it's a totally different thing: document timestamping service.

i think you missed the part where i said "I think this is because people mean different things when they talk about "blockchains"."

If that's what you think it is, suit yourself. Not a fan of word-play game.

> The only thing novel in document timestamping service called blockchain is that it doesn't need trusted third party.

Yeah, that's what I said. Like you said, it IS novel.

Re:Distributed Ledger without the Blockchain by dozzie on Wednesday October 04, 2017 @07:42PM (#15405739)
>> Blockchain does not build distributed consensus, it's a totally different thing: document timestamping service.

> i think you missed the part where i said "I think this is because people mean different things when they talk about "blockchains"."

Oh? So you say that they don't mean a cryptographically linked list of blocks, like Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain) describes? Because that's exactly how timestamping works: unmodifiable list of documents, from which you can tell which document was issued earlier. Then what else do they mean?