[dead]
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF
by sctb on Friday August 18, 2017 @11:05AM
(#15046825)
We've asked you many times not to post pure inflammation on Hacker News, so we've banned the account.
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF
by gormo2 on Friday August 18, 2017 @09:39AM
(#15045983)
There is nothing inherently bigoted about Islam or Muslims. Neo-Nazism however...
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF
by jimmyk on Friday August 18, 2017 @10:29AM
(#15046479)
Are you saying Islam doesn't teach Muslims to behave preferentially toward (some of) their fellow Muslims in any way?
[dead]
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF
by gormo2 on Friday August 18, 2017 @09:47AM
(#15046074)
The fact you just call them "Muslims" speaks volumes about you and your beliefs. Educate yourself #notallmuslims
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF
by tscs37 on Friday August 18, 2017 @10:08AM
(#15046290)
You should educate yourself because what you ask for is basically what happened to jews in the third reich. Not even something toned down or a "behind the curtains" deal, by doing this you are not better than the nazi's themselves, you stoop to their level.
Re:Google's stance on neo-Nazis 'dangerous', says EFF
by ptasci67 on Friday August 18, 2017 @09:47AM
(#15046085)
Insert point about the slippery slope fallacy here.
There is no debate amongst the vast majority of our society that neo-Nazis are provocateurs of hate, racism, and violence. Their beliefs (the suppression and murder of Jews, people of African descent, etc) cannot be tolerated in a civilised society.
The same debate about the role of Islam in terrorism in the Middle East and here in the US is nowhere near as settled. Therefore, I am not sure the slippery slope can be claimed here.