News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:Ti NE555 – real vs fake: weekend die-shot by PeterisP on Monday July 03, 2017 @05:42AM (#14687044)
As the article says, "If only have they marked it "CN555" with proper data-sheet - it would have been totally legitimate and fair product."

It's nice to produce new chip designs, and they should do more of that, but it's immoral and inefficient (it hurts everyone integrating your product) to say that you're producing X1 when you're producing X2.

Re:Ti NE555 – real vs fake: weekend die-shot by zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC on Monday July 03, 2017 @08:05AM (#14687630)
If anything, the fact that a lot of chips you can buy from China do not match their specification is exactly one thing that keeps China's semiconductor industry back. If some Chinese company built a cheaper and in every regard better NE555, they would have a very hard time marketing it because noone would trust that sellers offering them wouldn't be selling them recycled bad-quality TI parts instead.
Re:Ti NE555 – real vs fake: weekend die-shot by JustFinishedBSG on Monday July 03, 2017 @05:32AM (#14687004)
What does it have to do with race?
Re:Ti NE555 – real vs fake: weekend die-shot by cr0sh on Monday July 03, 2017 @12:51PM (#14689662)
OP's handle seems indicative of something...