[dead]
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by skynode on Sunday June 25, 2017 @11:13PM
(#14633794)
A differently sounding username would have at least helped your case. :)
Even if Windows kernel security is more robust, anybody can easily fault you for some form of cognitive bias. I use Windows, therefore Windows is more superior.
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by kazinator on Monday June 26, 2017 @12:01AM
(#14633987)
> A differently sounding username would have at least helped your case. :)
No, it wouldn't; it is quite obvious that the account was created by a Linux fanboi just to make this lame ironic joke, and that lame account creation just to make a lame (and off-topic) joke is likely why it was flagged.
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by KirinDave on Sunday June 25, 2017 @11:24PM
(#14633840)
This is a very weird post. It's like some kind of sith mind trick. "I'd love to know more, but your name implies a connection to the subject matter and we wouldn't want that chuckle taken the wrong way."
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by whoami_nr on Sunday June 25, 2017 @11:12PM
(#14633790)
>Linux will always lag behind Windows in kernel security
Are you serious about that statement ?
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by nisa on Monday June 26, 2017 @12:20AM
(#14634058)
I guess it's not too far from the reality - at least since Windows 10? Windows got a lot of stuff that is better than Linux in that regard. Control flow guard, Device Guard Virtualisation, ALSR - the current stack/heap guard page mess is also solved there. Linux is full of local priv escalation bugs (basically every update fixes one - http://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-33/pr...)
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by snuxoll on Sunday June 25, 2017 @11:30PM
(#14633859)
I'm not going to agree or disagree on this, but Microsoft's choice to shove all syscalls into a DLL where a defined ABI is easier to maintain certainly makes dramatic security improvements to the kernel easier without breaking userspace.
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by windows_lover on Monday June 26, 2017 @12:35AM
(#14634124)
I am indeed. Linux lacks many of the security features and exploit mitigations present in Windows, despite the efforts of contributors such as grsecurity.
There appears to be no overarching strategy in Linux to improve security, it's all rather haphazard.
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by motoboi on Sunday June 25, 2017 @10:58PM
(#14633730)
I'm upcoming you for good comedy.
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by tbodt on Sunday June 25, 2017 @11:06PM
(#14633768)
With a username of "windows_lover", what can I say?
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by chronoGloat on Sunday June 25, 2017 @11:04PM
(#14633757)
Bleh. There are enough NSA backdoors in implanted within Windows to the point that any sane person regards Microsoft security as pure theater.
Secrets aren't actually secrets in Windows at all.
Re:Linus: Don't bother with grsecurity. Their patches are pu...
by windows_lover on Monday June 26, 2017 @03:29AM
(#14634774)
Now that's just silliness.
I invite you to provide solid technical evidence of these supposed "NSA backdoors" in Windows.