News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:High-performance .NET by example: Filtering bot traffic by Someone1234 on Monday April 24, 2017 @04:31PM (#14188011)
That sounds more like a personal attack than a constructive response to the topic.

I only brought up large (old) codebases to put into context the kind of maintainability issues I am discussing, and why my perspective is what it is.

Re:High-performance .NET by example: Filtering bot traffic by osd on Monday April 24, 2017 @05:16PM (#14188377)
It's not a personal attack because I don't actually know anything about you, and I'm not claiming to. I'm making that statement in regard to your two posts up the chain. They are statements that don't reveal any solid, usable points other than to say "simpler code is easier to understand, sometimes performance doesn't matter as much" but in such a strong form as to suggest that the advice plays out a lot in the real world. It doesn't.
Re:High-performance .NET by example: Filtering bot traffic by abiox on Tuesday April 25, 2017 @12:49PM (#14195409)
> ..as to suggest that the advice plays out a lot in the real world. It doesn't.

what makes you say that?