News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol. Parent comment

[dead]
Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by tptacek on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @11:34AM (#12901599)
You should be embarrassed to be repeating these falsehoods on this thread.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by Dolores12 on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @12:30PM (#12902162)
your falsehood claims are no better, Joe. telegram puts their money where their claims are. and you cite reuters as reputable source. just wow.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Formal Security Analysis of the Signal Messaging Protocol by def_true_false on Tuesday November 08, 2016 @05:55PM (#12904683)
Yeah, using GCM to wake up the device is totally worse than sending 99% messages without end-to-end encryption.

What's wrong with Reuters? Would you prefer RT?

[ Parent | on HN ]