News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:After 100 years World War I battlefields are poisoned and... by rapind on Friday July 29, 2016 @06:11PM (#12190430)
"having the world taken over by a ruthless Empire that has invaded an occupied dozens of nations, and actively overthrowing states to install vassal dictators?"

Wait, isn't this still happening or are you referring to the Soviet Union?

Re:After 100 years World War I battlefields are poisoned and... by zaroth on Friday July 29, 2016 @10:27PM (#12191363)
But his point, modern warfare saving us from the unfathomable horrors of the World Wars, is well worth even the true cost of the fallout from the nuclear testing.
Re:After 100 years World War I battlefields are poisoned and... by PhasmaFelis on Saturday July 30, 2016 @03:22AM (#12192004)
If we're considering the potential cost of wars that didn't happen, we also need to consider the possibility for the Cold War to have escalated into nuclear Armageddon.
Re:After 100 years World War I battlefields are poisoned and... by zaroth on Sunday July 31, 2016 @10:14PM (#12199872)
Quite certainly true. The ultimate and most insane gamble... which appears to have paid off, for now?